Mujuru London visit and a panicky Zanu-PF

The recent visit by Dr Joice Mujuru to London shook the foundations of Zanu-PF hegemony triggering some panic in the disintegrating former liberation party.

By Jealousy Mawarire

The amount of fake news and contrived statements attributed to Dr Mujuru by spooky Zanu-PF media zealots give testimony to the fact that Dr Mujuru touched some raw nerve, is on course to dismantling the hitherto perceived notion that Zanu-PF is invincible and is laying bare the excesses of a regime built and perfected around a dictator called Robert Mugabe.

Some Herald columnist has even gone to the extent of alleging that the interviews that Dr Mujuru had with Tim Sebastian of Deutsche Welle and Stephen John Sackur of BBC Hard Talk were stage-managed to expose the human rights excesses of the Mugabe regime while absolving Mujuru of culpability in human rights abuses that occurred in Zimbabwe in the early eighties and in 2008 when Mugabe lost to Morgan Tsvangirai in the first round of the presidential election.

We gather state media journalists, especially those at the Herald, have been instructed to generate at least two negative stories on Mujuru everyday for 13 days from the day the Hard Talk interview was aired.

However, Zanu-PF is not limiting its anti-Mujuru propaganda to its official news outlets that the generality of our people have since discredited but has invaded the social media, a new, unregulated public sphere where rules, professionalism, accuracy and integrity matter very little, if at all. For a regime known for being corrupt, playing against rules, even in elections, the social media becomes attractive for propaganda purposes and outright disinformation.

Of particular note was a so-called “Open letter to Joice Mujuru”, written and circulated on social media by one Ngqabutho Nicholas Mabhena who claims to be a socialist, may be a fascist, schooled in Marxism-Leninism, long discredited philosophies that created some of the worst dictators and psychopaths this world has come to know and endure.

I will not delve into detail on its contents since it’s premised on a statement falsely attributed to Dr Mujuru which is not only fake news but a clearly contrived and inaccurate foolish reading of events surrounding the 2008 presidential election defeat of Zanu-PF.

Mabhena claims Dr Mujuru ‘confessed’ to rigging Tsvangirai in one of her public addresses in the UK. Nothing can be further from the truth. I accompanied Dr Mujuru on all her engagements in London and made sure everything that she said was captured on video both for public dissemination and for our own records. There is nowhere she said she took part in rigging Tsvangirai, not because of anything, but because she was never part of the Zanu-PF mafia responsible for rigging elections.

Anyone who has a sound mind and a bit of memory would know that Tsvangirai won the 2008 elections partly because of the role that Zanu-PF members aligned to Mujuru played to ensure their supporters voted for Zanu-PF MPs and Ward Councillors but voted  Tsvangirai for President. If that is not true, then what is bhora musango?
If one of the sins that Mugabe accuses Dr Mujuru and the late General Solomon Mujuru was engineering his defeat in 2008 through “Bhora Musango”, and Mugabe came out publicly on this while addressing a group of Zaoga church members at ZEGU in Mazowe last year, does it make sense to allege Dr Mujuru was involved in rigging Tsvangirai who had benefitted from bhora musango?

You can easily see that the statement attributed to Mujuru that she rigged Tsvangirai is meant to hold her responsible for the subsequent violence that the country witnessed in the run-up to the presidential run-off election on June 27 2008 and Mabhena does not make it a secret.

It was carefully crafted to ensure that while Mujuru can distance herself from Gukurahundi which was orchestrated by Mugabe, Emmerson Mnangagwa and Sydney Sekeramayi who headed key security ministries then; her admission to having rigged Tsvangirai would make it very difficult for her to distance herself from the subsequent violence that followed that electoral theft.

That it is a poor attempt at dragging Mujuru into the well-documented cases that Mugabe’s regime committed is not even a secret.  What is, however, interesting about many who have attempted to make a strong argument that Mujuru took part in the planning of some genocidal attacks on Zimbabweans by Mugabe, is the often disingenuous assumption that Mugabe is not a dictator and therefore consults with his cabinet and vice presidents on every decision he makes.

Suddenly, Zimbabweans are oblivious to the fact that Mugabe unilaterally decided to sent soldiers to the Democratic Republic of Congo, withdrew Zimbabwe from the Commonwealth and makes unilateral decisions even to pay civil servants bonuses when his Minister of Finance is against the idea. Surely such type of a leader is a dictator and dictators should be held accountable for their decisions and any attempts at spreading culpability by seeking to drag deputies is clear political cowardice.
It is oxymoronic to admit Mugabe is a dictator then attempt to blame his deputies for what he does. Every Zimbabwean knows cabinet does not sit in Mugabe’s absence. Zanu-PF officials know that the Politburo and Central Committee do not sit if Mugabe is away. If that is his type of administration, surely the buck stops with him. He has to be accountable for every missing person, for every mysterious death including that of General Mujuru. Mugabe is accountable for every one of the estimated 20 000 lives lost in Matabelelalnd and Midlands Provinces and not even his professed “madness” should be an excuse.

Mujuru, on the other hand, is on record, several times, chiding Zanu PF youths for unleashing violence on political opponents. At a rally in Hwange, where she was thanking the people of Matabeleland North for supporting her nomination for the post of Vice President of Zanu PF in 2004, Dr Mujuru spoke about her non-violent character which she said was not going to embarrass those that had chosen her to lead them.
She said, “I can assure you that my character will not tarnish your image. I will not embarrass you.” She then appealed to the youths to desist from political violence ahead of general elections which were slated for 31 March 2005. She said, “Youths should desist from being used in political violence. This year, we want a peaceful election; this is the message to each and every youth.” (Chronicle January 31 2005).

The Chronicle of 30 January 2005, in an article by Reason Mpofu in Hwange, also reported that Dr Mujuru “urged members of the ruling party to be custodians of non-violent elections, considering the vast experience they have amassed in the past 25 years”.

In her address to the business community in a story headlined Business Talks to Zanu PF, Dr Mujuru is quoted by the Newsday of 09 December 2010 as having said:
“If you are out there and you kill in the name of Zanu PF, the law will catch up with you because an offence (once) committed should be brought to justice. Zanu PF won’t protect you. We don’t want be a country known for murder and harassment.”

At a rally in Mt Darwin on 28 May 2008, Dr Mujuru lashed out at the youths of the area for their role in political violence. “Who sent you to kill people, to hurt and cripple others? Short sleeve (Chopping off of greater part of the arm), long sleeve, (chopping off of wrists) where is that coming from?” she asked angrily.
She went on to ask, “I am number two, how come I don’t know about that directive to kill people for votes?
“That should stop because if you kill for Zanu PF, when the spirits of those you kill want to avenge they will come to your family not Zanu PF,” she said apparently angry after 12 people were brutally killed in her home area in acts of political violence in the run-up to the controversial Presidential run-off following the disputed March 29 2008 harmonised elections.

There are many accusations that have been made against Dr Mujuru but the underlying factor is that either those that make the allegations do not know her, or they are just malicious Zanu-PF functionaries who have made it their vocation trying to soil her otherwise impeccable reputation.

To understand Mujuru, it is imperative to enter into her political world and schemata and appreciate her understanding, while in Zanu-PF, that the dictatorial system of governance in the country was hinged on one man therefore to dislodge the system easily then, one had to work out a plan to remove Mugabe through existent party structures at congress.

She attempted it and it nearly worked. She knew then that to effectively do this, she needed to work out the party structures, entrench herself and build her own support base within the party then effect leadership renewal.

The process was long and arduous and did not only need her to work on the party structures, but to work on herself as well, hence her long stay in Zanu-PF.

She needed to upgrade herself academically and the choice of her academic discipline (strategic management) bears testimony to a woman who knew exactly what she wanted.

Mujuru, however, did not just devote her time to pursue academia and leadership renewal in the party but also embarked on several projects that changed people’s lives, including several irrigation projects during her tenure as Minister of Rural Resources and Water Development which made her popular among rural communities.
That is the Joice Mujuru I know, the Mujuru who will be the first female President of Zimbabwe.
Jealousy Mawarire is Spokesperson for National People’s Party.

One Comments

  • Hermish Dunga 20 / 03 / 2017

    1. that the two interviews were stage-managed is a fact ,because in both the interviews bbc hardtalk and dw_conflictzone she was saying and repeating the same thing which is a sign that she had rehearsed
    2.mujuru must come out clean telling the truth about her complicity in Zanu pf human rights abuse,were she take part and were she didn’t
    3.Mujuru must also tell us,what kind of a social ministry she was heading which does’nt care much about human rights abuse to the extent of not even question matabele killings?SOCIAL MINISTRY?
    4.Mujuru is also categorically denying Solomon complicity role in Gukurahundi saying the so-called 5th brigade was a special force ,but went on to admit that Solomon was involved when the fifth brigade was to be integrated into the ZNA???? oxymoron, denying and admitting at the same time which she did successfully without being noticed

Comments are closed.